The Time Travel Gene Trilogy – Kerstin Gier (8, 9&10/32 2017 Reading Challenge)

PrzechwytywanieTime Travel Gene Trilogy goes by three names; the other two being: The Precious Stone Trilogy, and The Ruby Red Trilogy. It consists of three books – Ruby Red, Sapphire Blue and Emerald Green – somehow, though, I can’t look at them as separate books. For me it’s like one story, and I am seriously unable to distinguish between the three. I’m not sure whether it’s because I read them – or rather swallowed them – throughout a fairly short time (around 3 days), or because they really are not that much different.

saphire blue.PNGTake The Hunger Games, though, for example. I read them through a very similar period of time – around 3 days – and it also felt like one sitting, but I was able to, from the beginning, distinguish between the three. With The Precious Stone Trilogy, though, every following book felt like the next chapter, really.

                Never mind that.

                Meet Gwyneth and Charlotte, her cousin, who is supposed to have a time travel gene, which forces her to travel in time. She’s been trained her whole life to be able to find herself in all circumstances. Somehow, though, somebody made a mistake and it’s Gwen who’s cursed – or gifted – with this gene. She’s totally unprepared, and just a “normal teenager.” By normal, I’m afraid, we have a rather silly teenager here. Yes, it’s Charlotte that has been prepared her whole life to fit into different eras – from riding horses to playing the piano. Gwen doesn’t know any of this. She also doesn’t seem to know basic history, or culture, or anything about arts, or any foreign language. She doesn’t know anything except for modern movies, especially romantic comedies. She’s also not able to remember one Latin sentence that’s an important password. She herself once says “I need a new brain.”

                Yet, she manages to make Gideon, beautiful and perfect, though albeit dull, to fall in love with her. And she manages to stop one greedy man from becoming immortal, and ultimately save the world. I guess this should make me a little angry, or just tired, or frustrated, or I’m not sure, just roll my eyes and stop reading. Cause, the idea that you can ignore what your teachers are saying to you, and just be rude and sarcastic, while at the same time pretty and kind of helpless, is what’s enough to be the crucial part in Big-Story-Involving-Saving-the-World, should make me angry. But it doesn’t.emerald green.PNG

                I guess it’s because I never took that series seriously. I treated it as a form of entertainment. A little silly, quite illogical, but entertaining as fuck. I mean, I am a sucker for time travel. If time travel existed, I’d have a big problem of where to go – future, past? If past, would that be before Christ? The XII century, the middle-ages? Since it’s impossible, at least I can read about how others see it. Be it a little silly, and mostly focused on clothes and parties – I’ll take that. And the idea of a heroine that has no idea what’s she’s doing – I’m sorry, but makes me laugh. Or at least smile/relax. Not to mention her friend, gargoyle. The funniest thing in the series.

                So, basically, the things I liked: the action, the humor, the characters, despite them being unrealistic (I mean, take Charlotte, it’s as if she’s not even human, just “evil” with no other characteristic, but being perfect at whatever she does; and Gideon, also perfect, and besides that, just … there). What I didn’t like: the characters (look above), the cheesy romance. I guess I might say these books were a guilty pleasure. Something I should dislike, but enjoyed reading nonetheless.

‘Til Death Do Us Part- Kate White (7/32 2017 Reading Challenge)

1

Baily Wiggins is a reporter dealing with “crime stories.” One day, when she’s cozy at her New York apartment she gets a call from Ashley, a fellow bridesmaid at the wedding that had taken place almost a year before. It turns out that Ashely has some disturbing news. Apparently, two other bridesmaids – out of six – died in weird accidents over the past six months. Ashely fears that they were murdered, and that she and Baily are the next ones to go. Baily starts an investigation, which will lead her to an unexpected discovery.

So, first thing I must say is that I disliked the protagonist – and her colleague, Ashley, as well – from the first 3 pages. I mean, someone calls you in the middle of a blizzard, says she has something important to tell you, but only face-to-face, and what do you do? Change your plans immediately, and go out into the blizzard to wherever they want to meet you.

Nope, not me. If I got a “I have to tell you something important right away” call, I’d say, “Then, come along to the coffee place that’s nearest to my apartment.” Not the other way round.

That’s of course a very minor thing of the book, but since it got me to dislike and roll my eyes over the main character from the get-go, I thought it was worth mentioning.

Other than that, I still remember my creative writer’s rule to say something nice about the book/piece of writing. However, I’m going to be rebellious on this one and will list things I did NOT like about this book:

– The protagonist, towards whom I never got any warmer feelings,

– Constant describing of what the characters were wearing, eating, and what kind of make-up they were wearing,

– Payton Cross – the bride at the (in)famous wedding, for which Bailey and Ashely were bridesmaids – being described practically as a “bitch” and having no other (redeeming) qualities. I mean, why would anyone be ever her friend,

– The fact that not too much was going on, and when something WAS – it was treated very randomly and quickly solved,

– The unfulfilled potential of showing how Baily was in constant fear, and how lonely she must have felt, as nobody believed her,

– The constant summary of things, instead of getting into real action,

– Failed attempt at humor, because it’s so funny that a person who works as a dietitian will eat healthy,

– Constant reminders of how ugly the bridesmaids’ dresses were,

– Her going to Florida for practically nothing – and super conveniently having an interview there, so her company (newspaper she worked for) could pay for the trip,

– Bailey’s breaking up with Jack – ooppss, SPOILERS – for no valid reason.

            And well, yeah, let’s list one thing I DID like – who the murdered was. It’s not like I didn’t see it coming, but I still thought it was a good surprise and tied all together.

            All in all, wouldn’t recommend. It’s not completely bad, either – written quite decently, and with a nice ending. It’s probably just that it’s “women’s literature” – or, if you mean, a chick flick – with a little bit of a crime story, and I was expecting, well, a crime story.

            Should have known after The Sixes.

My Rating 4/10

Just Listen – Sarah Dessen (6/32 2017 Reading Challenge)

2

Annabel has everything in life – she’s a popular cheerleader, surrounded by popular friends. And, she works as a model. Until one day, after an incident at the party, her friends turn their backs on her, and she becomes a school’s recluse. Fortunately, she makes friends with an original loner and a music freak, Owen, who shows her the world of sounds. And teaches her that the truth is what matters and that she shouldn’t be afraid to speak up, because when she does, people will listen.

                The cover of the Polish edition promises me that the book is about “school, popularity, and rivalry.” Of course, there’s that. But I’d say that (fortunately) it’s about much more. Firstly, we have a family portrait. A family, where nobody speaks about their feelings, but hides in their rooms whenever something is wrong. A family with two older sisters, mother prone to depression and a quiet, withdrawn father. This family is what made the protagonist the way she is. Careful with hurting other people’s feelings and determined to fulfil her mother’s wishes to be nice to everyone.

                It’s dangerous to be nice all the time, as Annabel finds out. We may lose ourselves in the constant efforts to please other people. We may forget and get confused on not only what we want, but who we are as a person. Not speaking up is frustrating and white lies are sometimes worse than the truth.

                Owen teaches the protagonist that the truth is always best, even when it hurts. Because it hurts yourself more when you’re living a life that’s not what you planned. Ultimately, it may lead to depression and isolation. Finally, the book tells that it’s important to speak up, to tell what happened and not be afraid or ashamed. That people will listen and some, if not all, will understand.

                Basically, it’s some version of “The truth will set you free.”

So, the book wasn’t perfectly written or too sophisticated. Despite dealing with some important subjects (like accepting ourselves, and learning to be assertive), and important & dark topics – (rape, anorexia), it didn’t have that heavy feeling there might be associated with such topics. Instead, it was hopeful and even light in tone. I read it in approximately one day – it read really smoothly.

                The one thing I didn’t like is the protagonist. I understood her, I sympathized with her, but I wasn’t a fan. Not because she was just always nice to everyone – I can definitely relate to that! Not because she didn’t have courage to tell about what happened to her on the party, where her ex-friend’s boyfriend tried to rape her. That is definitely understandable. But because she was friends with Sophia in the first place. Sophia is the books version of the “mean girl” of high school. She’s manipulative, but exciting. Her moods change all the time, but she’s fun to be around (when she’s in a good mood). She’s self-confident and she knows what she wants and grabs it. But she also makes fun of other people, and is vindictive. I couldn’t understand why Annabel kept being friends with her for four years.

                Except for that, I have a feeling characters in that book were a little too one-dimensional, and sometimes cliché. From the reviews I read, most readers loved Owen. I can understand why. Tall, dark, handsome, reformed bad-boy. It has its appeal, even to me. But, for half the time he annoyed the hell out of me. I thought he was a “know-it-all,” and I suspect I would have disliked most of his music, too. Maybe I’m just not that smart to understand music on deeper level? Yeah, well.

                And there’s Sophie. She’s totally unbelievable. Mostly because, she doesn’t seem like a real person. She seems to possess all the bad qualities and not to possess too many of the good ones. In real life it’s always more complicated, but here Sophia’s inner life is almost completely ignored. And I just ain’t buyin’ that. Moreover, it’s sad that the author doesn’t dig deeper into Sophia’s problems with her family – they are only briefly mentioned.

                There’s one more “elephant in the room” for me. The book bears a striking resemblance to Speak by Laurie H. Anderson. Speak is a YA book that I think isSpeak! one of the best written I’ve ever read, so another book about more or less the same subject – well, the bar was high. And Just Listen didn’t get close enough.

                That said, I’m not criticizing the book completely. It reads fast, deals with important subjects, and has a relatable protagonist (except for the modelling business). For a Young Adult flick, it’s quite all right and worth reading.

My Rating 6/10

The Survivors’ Club – Lisa Gardner (5/32 2017 Reading Challenge)

               1 Jillian, Carol and Meg are all victims of College Hill Rapist. They form a club, and call it the Survivors’ Club – they don’t like to be called victims. Now, after they had helped the police to put the rapist/murdered in jail, he gets killed, and they – get to be the first suspects. Could they have been driven to murder, or is there more to the story than it seems?

                Of course there is. The story is much more complicated than it seems. The characters are very well-written and complex, and I liked how the point of view was switching chapter by chapter. Then, there’s Griffin, the hot policeman with past trauma, which makes him more interesting. The girls themselves are also fun to read about, and make you root for them. And it’s great that they can form lasting friendship despite being completely different.

                So far so good, but it wasn’t all stars for this book. Some things I didn’t like – really implausible ending, that made me ask questions of “how much sperm does one guy leave in the bank sperm?” or “what exactly does it mean that DNA almost match? Shouldn’t it just match?” Bu maybe I just don’t know something.

                The other thing is that at times it dragged for too long, unnecessarily. I was skipping some fragments, just to get to the actual action, and I got tired of some repeatedly described feelings/thoughts.

                I’d still say it was quite good. The ending was surprising, as it should be in a suspense novel. The pacing was quite good – for most parts of the book – and the characters well-developed.

                Oh, and one more thing – the very last scene, where they were all together. Sweet, so sweet. However – too corny, and as much as most of the dialogue seemed real, here seemed too forced and fake.

                My rating – 6/10

Beat the Reaper – John Bazell (4/32 Reading Challenge)

              przechwytywanie  Peter Brown is an intern at the worst hospital in Manhattan. He also has a secret – he used to be a killer for the mafia, but after a conflict with them, he turned to the police and became a part of Federal Witness Relocation Program in exchange for some useful information about his former bosses. Now his past comes back to haunt him, when someone recognizes him at the hospital. Peter realizes that only hours or minutes can be between him and death.

                Beat The Reaper is written from two perspectives – one chapter is in the present, the next is in the past. Both parts are equally entertaining, and both are treated with the same dose of great dark humor. Its gruesome, and filled with sharp dialogue, so only lovers of good old dark humor will enjoy it. It’s also filled with action, and mind you – you never know what’s around the next corner.

                The medical staff included in the book was an interesting addition. The ending seemed a little rush, but there was a great medical twist, so I can forgive that.

                All in all, the books was amazing. And amazingly irreverent. Sometimes totally ridiculous, sometimes disturbing, but a page-turner at all times. Despite the dark topic, it was a relief after We need to talk about Kevin. It was irreverent, and funny, and unique, and all a dark comedy should be. Recommended.

My Rating – 7/10

The Sixes – Kate White (3/32 Reading Challenge 2017)

                przechwytywanieA famous writer, Phoebe Hall, flees to Pennsylvania, where she starts teaching at a small college, after she had been dumped by her boyfriend and accused of plagiarism. Still, she cannot get peace. One of the students goes missing, and turns out to be dead. The headmistress and Phoebe’s close friend asks her to investigate on her own, which leads Phoebe to discover more lies and the truth that was buried underneath.

                It is a perfect book… for lazy afternoons. It doesn’t require thinking too much – yes, of course you’re going to be guessing who the killer is, but besides that it’s just pure entertainment. One condition, though – you should disarm your logic. And sense of probability. That said, I just don’t like detective-amateurs. I prefer when the real police gets to the case. Because well, looking for celebrity’s weak points, to write books about them  as our protagonist used to do – is not exactly the same as being able to solve a murder case. In my humble opinion.

                What do we have next? Oh, the handsome love interest. With a dark past, that of course is not so dark after all. The characters were likeable enough to keep me rooting for them. But that’s about all I can say about them. They were likeable. Nice. Charming, maybe. Except for that – they lacked much depth. And the love thread made me ask the “internal question” again – do people in USA really have sex after they’ve been on one or two dates only? I mean, seriously? You’re not even sure if he’s a murderer or not, but you’ll go to bed with him? Yes, I know, she accused him of that later on, but still – if you don’t really know or trust a guy, why would you have intercourse with him? I wouldn’t. Just sayin’

                I was also a little disappointed at the end. The murderer turned out to be unexpected, which was good, but The Sixes, a students’ informal group, should have had a more prominent role. After all, they are in the title, and it’s around them that the book is centered. I suspected they are the red herring, but still I hoped they would be more… dangerous? Harmful? Devious? Anything. What turned out of them was a big blah.

                Okay, still I don’t think it was a bad book and I wouldn’t discourage you from reading it. Just don’t have high hopes. It’s rather a “women’s literature”, or a chick-flick than anything else. Good on a plane, or on the beach, on vacation, when you’re waiting for the doctor’s appointment. For some time/somewhere you don’t have to be that focused. You know what I mean. Fun to read and to guess, but totally forgettable. Well, you know, not every book has to have deeper meaning and aspire to change the world, right?

My Rating 5/10

Lionel Shriver – We Need to Talk About Kevin (Reading Challenge 2017, 2/32)

               kevin2 Every monster has a mother. This is a story about one of them.

                Kevin was 16 years old when he murdered 7 of his classmates and 2 adults. Nobody really knew why. Everyone was wondering, but nobody had the real answer. And mind you, neither do we, readers, after reading this long, wonderful novel.

                It’s written in the form of letters that Eva, Kevin’s mother, writes to her estranged husband, Franklin. She tells him about her every-day life and chance encounters with mother of one the murdered kids. About her visits to the prison, to see Kevin. But, she also tells him about their life together – and her point of view on that life. She recollects and vividly describes every single thing she thinks is important to understand Kevin and his actions. She starts at time from before Kevin was born, and goes to Thursday, where Kevin committed the murder. I guess Eva wants to understand her own actions and find the answer to the question everybody’s always asking in such cases – is this my fault? Is it the parents’ fault? Is it the mother’s fault?

                We never find out. It’s not a novel that would give answers, or any sense of completion. It’s not a novel that justifies anything. On the contrary, it touches deeply hidden instincts, brings out the most difficult questions, and presents issues we like to forget, or pretend they don’t exist. Like, what if the mother can’t love her own child? What if she’s tired and not able to form a bond with him or her?

                The issue of unwanted pregnancy and then maternity seems to prevail in the whole novel, but is not the only one. Eva agrees to have her first child at a late age of 37, and when she does, it’s mostly for her husband. There is one thing she is sure of – she loves her husband and wants to make him happy. If he thinks their life is empty without a child, so be it. After initial hesitation, she manages to convince herself that’s what she wants. Only to regret it at some deep level, almost immediately. She feels trapped while pregnant. She feels trapped as a mother. They all told her that when the child is born, something “unimaginable happens.” Something that cannot be described. Something mothers feel instantly. She waits for it – and it never happens for her. Not with Kevin. She gave birth to a child, to whom she didn’t feel a thing right from the start.

                It’s not that she didn’t try. She did everything she could and she was told to. But Kevin was a difficult baby. He would either cry for endless periods of time, or keep quiet at all times. He didn’t get much easier with time, either. He was deeply disturbed, but also very lonely and very intelligent. From Eva’s point of view, he was manipulative, and never let his father know what he really was like – a confused, angry, depressed, unfeeling child and teenager. But that’s the thing with this novel – we only get Eva’s point of view. So, even though she doesn’t hide anything, and is always brutally honest, and doesn’t even justify herself, we are still left with a question: do we trust her? Her judgment of the situation? Do we trust that she doesn’t lie to herself, and makes her believe things?

                And then we have the father. The oblivious, childlike father, who would always find an excuse for Kevin. Eva was the one who saw evil in her own child, but Franklin was the one who never thought Kevin did anything wrong. As much as Eva loved Franklin, I disliked him. I wanted to shake him and yell to get some help for the child before it’s too late. But Franklin didn’t. He believed till the very end that their son, his flesh and blood, was just a normal teenager. So, he wore diapers till the age of six, and he had problems speaking. So, he wasn’t invited to playdates, and almost no nanny was able to survive taking care of him. These things happen. So, the nanny left. So, he didn’t want to give diapers up. But he did give them up, right? So, we’re still one big happy American family.

                It’s just that Eva never told Franklin how she got Kevin to give the diapers up.

kevinWe are coming to the topic of evil itself. It might have been because Eva rejected Kevin at the very beginning, and – as an intelligent and instinctive child – he always felt it at some level. But what if he really was evil? We want to believe that nobody is born evil, that bad people are just unhappy people who were hurt early in life. That circumstances made them murder, or steal. That they are mentally ill. What if they’re not? What if somebody just feels so deeply the hopelessness of life that they think only murder can do anything for them? What if somebody just doesn’t have any empathy?

                The book is also a criticism of modern age Western countries – I’d say not only America. A country where people are not starving –at least, not the way they do in Africa. A country, where you can have anything you want – if you have money. Everything, but love. Everything, but sense of life. Everything, but sense of anything being worth pursuing. How many of you have heard of Ted Bundy, serial killer? I have. Do you know the name of his victim? Just one? I don’t.

                That’s the reason Kevin gives. If you want to be famous, you can always try to be an actress, or publish a book and be the next J. K. Rowling. But this requires hard work, planning, practicing, lots of disappointments, and is never by any means a sure thing. But if you kill a few people, especially when you’re original and will NOT do it with a gun, you’re instantly famous. You’re the Next Big Thing and they’re doing interviews with you. Asking for your childhood, for your reasons, for your thoughts, for everything.

                We Need to Talk About Kevin is not just a novel. It’s a great piece of literature. It is one of the best books I’ve read recently. It may be one of the best books I read at all. But it’s a difficult one. Disturbing and unforgiving. Brutally honest, and cruel. It’s a book where a woman will tell you that she’s not surprised when children go nuts and kill other children, but pure goodness of her own daughter is the biggest surprise for her. Anything somebody ever does for good, for no interest at all, is a surprise for her. Finally, it’s an important book in the era of people killing people. Regardless of the reasons, regardless of circumstances, it’s there. Thirst for blood. Hatred. Sense of hopelessness. This book will drain you, and will make you feel sorry for humankind. Maybe even ashamed.

                But maybe that’s the way we should feel.

My rating: 10/10